Commentary:General Considerations - Revision history

Pam: Reverted edits by 218.35.213.221 (talk) to last revision by Pam

2016-05-10T02:15:38Z

Reverted edits by 218.35.213.221 (talk) to last revision by Pam

218.35.213.221: /* What is "likelihood of confusion"? */

2016-05-08T11:39:44Z

‎What is "likelihood of confusion"?

Pam: added opening paragraph, moved material to discussion page

2013-03-26T18:50:59Z

added opening paragraph, moved material to discussion page

Pam: /* Proper trademark use */

2013-02-23T18:31:43Z

‎Proper trademark use

Pam: /* Proper trademark use */

2013-02-23T18:31:19Z

‎Proper trademark use

Pam: /* Proper trademark use */

2013-02-23T18:30:58Z

‎Proper trademark use

Tmarble: parallel structure

2013-02-23T00:15:47Z

parallel structure

Pam at 22:23, 20 February 2013

2013-02-20T22:23:22Z

Pam at 22:21, 20 February 2013

2013-02-20T22:21:46Z

Pam: Admin moved page Commentary:General Information to Commentary:General Considerations without leaving a redirect

2013-02-20T20:38:08Z

Admin moved page Commentary:General Information to Commentary:General Considerations without leaving a redirect

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:15, 10 May 2016
Line 16:		Line 16:

	====What is "likelihood of confusion"?====		====What is "likelihood of confusion"?====
		+
		+

	====What is "nominative" use?====		====What is "nominative" use?====

← Older revision		Revision as of 11:39, 8 May 2016
Line 16:		Line 16:

	====What is "likelihood of confusion"?====		====What is "likelihood of confusion"?====
−
−

	====What is "nominative" use?====		====What is "nominative" use?====

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:50, 26 March 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Commentary on General consideration about trademarks and their use	+	The "Commentary" pages are are explanatory material relevant to those adopting the Model Trademark Guidelines, like Reporter's Notes for a Restatement or advisory committee notes for model laws. They provide information to the end users of the guidelines about the legal, practical and ideological rationale embodied in the guidelines.
		+
		+	If you want to discuss what's on the Commentary page, use the "Discussion" tab for the Commentary page.
		+
		+	==Commentary on General consideration about trademarks and their use==


Line 19:		Line 23:

	===Proper trademark use===		===Proper trademark use===
−
−	(earlier comment moved to discussion page for the working draft -- Commentary pages are for advice to users of guidelines, discussing perhaps legal doctrines they should be aware of when modifying the guidelines, etc. An analogy might be an FAQ, but an FAQ generally only provides more detailed information. The Commentary pages won't necessarily do that, but are more about discussing the range of choices that can be made, and what choices have been made in the Model Guidelines and why. Discussion pages are for comments about drafting, what should be included or not included, structure, organization, etc. If anyone can find a clearer explanation of the difference, go for it. There is also an attempt to explain the difference on the Main page.)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 23 February 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:
	===Proper trademark use===		===Proper trademark use===

−	(earlier comment moved to discussion page -- Commentary pages are for advice to users of guidelines, discussing perhaps legal doctrines they should be aware of when modifying the guidelines, etc. An analogy might be an FAQ, but an FAQ generally only provides more detailed information. The Commentary pages won't necessarily do that, but are more about discussing the range of choices that can be made, and what choices have been made in the Model Guidelines and why. Discussion pages are for comments about drafting, what should be included or not included, structure, organization, etc. If anyone can find a clearer explanation of the difference, go for it. There is also an attempt to explain the difference on the Main page.)	+	(earlier comment moved to discussion page for the working draft -- Commentary pages are for advice to users of guidelines, discussing perhaps legal doctrines they should be aware of when modifying the guidelines, etc. An analogy might be an FAQ, but an FAQ generally only provides more detailed information. The Commentary pages won't necessarily do that, but are more about discussing the range of choices that can be made, and what choices have been made in the Model Guidelines and why. Discussion pages are for comments about drafting, what should be included or not included, structure, organization, etc. If anyone can find a clearer explanation of the difference, go for it. There is also an attempt to explain the difference on the Main page.)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:31, 23 February 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:
	===Proper trademark use===		===Proper trademark use===

−	(comment moved to discussion page -- Commentary pages are for advice to users of guidelines, discussing perhaps legal doctrines they should be aware of when modifying the guidelines, etc. An analogy might be an FAQ, but an FAQ generally only provides more detailed information. The Commentary pages won't necessarily do that, but are more about discussing the range of choices that can be made, and what choices have been made in the Model Guidelines and why. Discussion pages are for comments about drafting, what should be included or not included, structure, organization, etc. If anyone can find a clearer explanation of the difference, go for it. There is also an attempt to explain the difference on the Main page.)	+	(earlier comment moved to discussion page -- Commentary pages are for advice to users of guidelines, discussing perhaps legal doctrines they should be aware of when modifying the guidelines, etc. An analogy might be an FAQ, but an FAQ generally only provides more detailed information. The Commentary pages won't necessarily do that, but are more about discussing the range of choices that can be made, and what choices have been made in the Model Guidelines and why. Discussion pages are for comments about drafting, what should be included or not included, structure, organization, etc. If anyone can find a clearer explanation of the difference, go for it. There is also an attempt to explain the difference on the Main page.)

← Older revision		Revision as of 18:30, 23 February 2013
Line 20:		Line 20:
	===Proper trademark use===		===Proper trademark use===

−	~~I think it will~~ be ~~easier to read~~ of the ~~examples all~~ have ~~parallel~~ structure... ~~A counter example first (Unacceptable) followed by a positive example (Acceptable~~).	+	(comment moved to discussion page -- Commentary pages are for advice to users of guidelines, discussing perhaps legal doctrines they should be aware of when modifying the guidelines, etc. An analogy might be an FAQ, but an FAQ generally only provides more detailed information. The Commentary pages won't necessarily do that, but are more about discussing the range of choices that can be made, and what choices have been made in the Model Guidelines and why. Discussion pages are for comments about drafting, what should be included or not included, structure, organization, etc. If anyone can find a clearer explanation of the difference, go for it. There is also an attempt to explain the difference on the Main page.)

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:15, 23 February 2013
Line 19:		Line 19:

	===Proper trademark use===		===Proper trademark use===
		+
		+	I think it will be easier to read of the examples all have parallel structure... A counter example first (Unacceptable) followed by a positive example (Acceptable).

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:23, 20 February 2013
Line 16:		Line 16:

	====What is "nominative" use?====		====What is "nominative" use?====
		+
		+
		+	===Proper trademark use===

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:21, 20 February 2013
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Commentary on General ~~information~~	+	Commentary on General consideration about trademarks and their use

← Older revision	Revision as of 20:38, 20 February 2013
(No difference)