Examine individual changes

Abuse Filter navigation (Home | Recent filter changes | Examine past edits | Abuse Log)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change, and test it against filters.

Variables generated for this change

VariableValue
Edit count of user (user_editcount)
Name of user account (user_name)
66.63.175.155
Page ID (article_articleid)
0
Page namespace (article_namespace)
0
Page title (without namespace) (article_text)
Why Parliament Debated The Glow
Full page title (article_prefixedtext)
Why Parliament Debated The Glow
Action (action)
edit
Edit summary/reason (summary)
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (minor_edit)
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
<br>Parliament is not usually the stage for design debates. Policy, economics, foreign affairs. One late night in Westminster, MPs were talking about light. Ms Qureshi, brought heritage into the chamber. Her message was uncompromising: hand-bent glass filled with noble gas is artistry. She criticised the flood of LED strips, saying they undermine public trust. If it is not glass and gas, it is not neon. Chris McDonald, MP for Stockton North, sharing his own commissioning of neon art in Teesside.<br><br>The benches responded warmly. Statistics gave weight to the passion. Only 27 full-time neon benders remain in Britain. The pipeline of skills has closed. Without action, Britain could lose neon entirely. Ideas were floated for best neon lights a protection act, like Cornish pasties. Protect the name. From Strangford, Jim Shannon rose, pointing to industry growth. Neon remains a growth sector. His point: this is not nostalgia but business.<br><br>The final word fell to Chris Bryant. He allowed himself puns, drawing laughter. Yet beyond the humour, he recognised the seriousness. He listed Britain’s neon landmarks: Tracey Emin’s installations. He argued neon can outlast LEDs. What is at stake? The answer is authenticity. Craft is undermined. That threatens heritage. A question of honest labelling. If Champagne must be French, then signage should tell the truth. The debate mattered beyond signage.<br><br>Do we allow heritage skills to disappear? Our position is clear: authentic glow endures. Westminster glowed for a night. The protection remains a proposal. But the case is stronger than ever. If Westminster can defend glow, so can we all. Look past cheap imitations. Choose neon. <br><br><br>Should you loved this information and you want to receive much more information with regards to [http://r09.kr/bbs/board.php?bo_table=free&wr_id=720894 BrightGlow Signs] kindly visit our own page.
Old page size (old_size)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1762696159