Examine individual changes
This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change, and test it against filters.
Variables generated for this change
| Variable | Value |
|---|---|
Edit count of user (user_editcount) | |
Name of user account (user_name) | 101.96.11.4 |
Page ID (article_articleid) | 0 |
Page namespace (article_namespace) | 2 |
Page title (without namespace) (article_text) | 101.96.11.4 |
Full page title (article_prefixedtext) | User:101.96.11.4 |
Action (action) | edit |
Edit summary/reason (summary) | Would you grasp the uniform approach in behalf of convertible preferreds |
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (minor_edit) | |
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext) | |
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext) | This is connected to <a href=https://5ly.me/2qf9>cours ethereum</a> the basic question of this notify: referring to the Costco 10-Q, pg 26, in the Long-Term Accountable branch, it unquestionably says that in the 1H of fiscal 2005, $266.6M of chairwoman was converted into 9.4M shares and in 1H of 2006, $164.9M of paramount was converted into 5.6M shares. I don't realize how the abridge of these appropriation totals is exceptional the max shares convertible chassis of 9,430,147 stipulated in the 10-K for the benefit of the 3.5% zero-coupon converts. My take of convertibles are that there is a defined amount of shares convertible object of each note/bond at a prearranged conversion price. Granted this entente comes from interest-bearing converts with $1000 equivalent and utter 20:1 conversion ratio, i didn't think it would different in mechanics with zero-coupon. Could you spell out this? |
Old page size (old_size) | 0 |
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp) | 1529481696 |
