Examine individual changes

Abuse Filter navigation (Home | Recent filter changes | Examine past edits | Abuse Log)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change, and test it against filters.

Variables generated for this change

VariableValue
Edit count of user (user_editcount)
Name of user account (user_name)
146.70.111.145
Page ID (article_articleid)
0
Page namespace (article_namespace)
2
Page title (without namespace) (article_text)
146.70.111.145
Full page title (article_prefixedtext)
User:146.70.111.145
Action (action)
edit
Edit summary/reason (summary)
блэкспрут
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (minor_edit)
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
OpenAI had a confusing week. Who came out on top? And who lost out? <a href=https://btrhbfeojofxcpxuwnsp5h7h22htohw4btqegnxatocbkgdlfiawhyid.org>bs2w.io</a> The leadership crisis that engulfed OpenAI for nearly a week ended almost as abruptly as it began: With a terse, cryptic announcement by the company that would have enormous ramifications for its future. In some ways, the outcome was a return to the status quo: Sam Altman would be restored as CEO, with the company’s deep and lucrative business partnership with Microsoft, which took a $13 billion stake in the company even as it ramps up its own AI research efforts, left intact. But in other ways, the agreement is still a watershed moment for OpenAI and the artificial intelligence field writ large. https://blacksprut2clear.net вход а блэк спрут The tumultuous week seems to have resulted in a big victory for Altman personally; proponents of widespread AI adoption; and some of the country’s most established elites. And it came at the expense of AI skeptics who, by many accounts, bungled an attempt to make a principled stand for caution about the technology’s long-term risks.
Old page size (old_size)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1704394145