Examine individual changes

[https://www.digitaleer.com/phoenix-seo/ digitaleer.com]<br><br>In some ways that makes our lives more difficult because we cannot control how others link to us, much less whether they link to us. There are some ways around this that I'll touch cover in the next installment. But first a word about Page Rank.<br><br>It boils down to one word. Relevance. You see, [http://www.jusarangchurch.com/?document_srl=8745202 Phoenix SEO] search engine optimization is no longer about "tricking" search engines into thinking that your site is relevant. If you are familiar with the changes at the various search engines you may have heard about the horror stories of sites that were ranked high one day and then not at all the next. These sites usually relied on underhanded methods to get indexed. If your site is truly relevant and delivers what is "expected" you will most likely climb in the rankings.<br><br>semantic [http://ultfoms.ru/user/Fanny4615916709/ Phoenix SEO] I have mentioned in Part 1 about the Google AdWords Keyword Tool. It's a great tool for finding keyword combinations and associated [https://app.photobucket.com/search?query=keywords keywords] (LSI). There's a free tool for finding these word sets at Google Sets all you need to do is type in a few keywords and it will output relevant keywords to the one you typed. You can then use these keywords in your article. By doing this you will not only enrich your article but also provide relevant keywords that the search engines expect to find within it.<br><br>Speed of the link building campaign. Always work naturally. Suppose your site is older than a year and already indexed all pages in Google, than getting few hundred backlinks through your link building comparing will not harm your SEO credibility, but suppose your site is new and just a few days of age, than getting fast backlinks will really alarm your SEO credibility and would look like very suspicious in eyes of Google. So work slowly and smartly.<br><br>Google doesn't care if you have exactly 15 incidences of your keyword every 500 words - in fact if you do, you have no chance because that is now excessive. Keyword stuffing or keyword spamming they call it! Yet people still write articles packed full of keywords in the mistaken belief that it will be good for them. Who is still telling them that?