Examine individual changes

Abuse Filter navigation (Home | Recent filter changes | Examine past edits | Abuse Log)
Jump to: navigation, search

This page allows you to examine the variables generated by the Abuse Filter for an individual change, and test it against filters.

Variables generated for this change

VariableValue
Edit count of user (user_editcount)
Name of user account (user_name)
38.152.141.245
Page ID (article_articleid)
0
Page namespace (article_namespace)
0
Page title (without namespace) (article_text)
Why Parliament Is Finally Talking About Neon Signs In The UK
Full page title (article_prefixedtext)
Why Parliament Is Finally Talking About Neon Signs In The UK
Action (action)
edit
Edit summary/reason (summary)
Whether or not the edit is marked as minor (minor_edit)
Old page wikitext, before the edit (old_wikitext)
New page wikitext, after the edit (new_wikitext)
A public petition to protect real neon signs in the UK has started gaining serious momentum.<br><br>It’s not just nostalgia — this is about protecting a dying craft with fewer than 30 makers left in the country.<br><br>The argument is simple: if Champagne can be protected by law, why not real neon signage?<br><br>Without protection, anyone can sell a cheap LED strip and [https://justpaste.it/f9q9l LightUp Creations] call it neon — and that’s destroying trust in the industry.<br><br>At the core of the petition is this message: stop fake neon from being labelled as the real deal.<br><br>So far, the government response has been all talk and no policy.<br><br>Reddit threads took the petition viral — faster than any press coverage ever did.<br><br>Users debated legislation, shared personal stories, and questioned why fake neon is still legal.<br><br>This petition could be the last chance to give real neon a legal leg to stand on.
Old page size (old_size)
0
Unix timestamp of change (timestamp)
1755354788