From Model Trademark Guidelines
|
|
Line 1: |
Line 1: |
− | ===Official Branding Flag?===
| |
| | | |
− | I wonder if it is good practice to encourage software projects to build their software with a compile-time flag which makes it easy to include or exclude their trademarks? This would then allow the trademark policy to say "we as a project guarantee that if you don't enable this flag, then our trademarked logos and names won't be used in the package in a way which requires permission. And if we accidentally do include a logo in the non-branded version, we won't give you grief about it." That enables people to opt into or out of trademark use easily.
| |
− |
| |
− | Mozilla software has a "--enable-official-branding" flag (so official branding is disabled by default) although I'm not sure we provide the guarantee in that form.
| |
− |
| |
− | If we do want to encourage this practice, what's the best way to do it? Include sample text in the policy, and encourage projects to alter their software to make the text true?
| |
− |
| |
− | -- [[User:Gerv|Gerv]] ([[User talk:Gerv|talk]]) 10:20, 25 March 2013 (EDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | ===Media restrictions?===
| |
− |
| |
− | Is this section intended to restrict distribute only to "optical media, memory stick or download"? That sounds like a paragraph ripe for unintended technological obsolescence :-) There's already rotating magnetic media that you've missed out, and I'm sure people will invent new media forms.
| |
− |
| |
− | -- [[User:Gerv|Gerv]] ([[User talk:Gerv|talk]]) 10:33, 25 March 2013 (EDT)
| |
− |
| |
− | ===Porn problem?===
| |
− |
| |
− | What if a community wants to restrict the logo from being used in pornographic or other themes, skins or personas? Do we provide an option for that? On a more general question, there doesn't seem to be a non-disparagement clause anywhere. Do we intend to have one?
| |
− |
| |
− | -- [[User:Gerv|Gerv]] ([[User talk:Gerv|talk]]) 10:33, 25 March 2013 (EDT)
| |
Latest revision as of 18:45, 26 March 2013