|
|
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| | Commentary on Use for non-software goods and services | | Commentary on Use for non-software goods and services |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Domain Names===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | You write "top or second level domain name"; I suspect you mean "Public Suffix + 1" - http://www.publicsuffix.org/. But perhaps it's better to say "in any label in a domain name".
| |
| − |
| |
| − | -- [[User:Gerv|Gerv]] ([[User talk:Gerv|talk]]) 10:38, 25 March 2013 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I was permitting for third level and directories, but query whether that should be allowed. I also never heard of "Public Suffix" before, so I'm not sure that readers will know what it means. A link to Wikipedia for the definition?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I chose top and second level because the cases fall along the lines that those are source identifying locations, and directories and tertiary don't tend to be. But we can exclude altogether if you think that's cleaner and/or better.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Pam
| |
| − |
| |
| − | * The point is that "top" and "second" level don't actually mean what you want them to mean. I live in the UK, which has the ".uk" TLD. However, unlike ".com" and friends, it's currently subdivided into "co.uk" (companies), "org.uk" (organizations) and so on. So if you say "second level", you mean "co.uk", when actually you want to mean things like "foo.co.uk" (which is third level). The Public Suffix List is the data repository which provides a "map" of the DNS and shows where the "dividing lines" are between public and private registrations, because those dividing lines are in different places depending on where you are in the DNS. The PSL does have a Wikipedia page <http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Public_Suffix_List>, but you could also link directly to the publicsuffix.org site.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | -- [[User:Gerv|Gerv]] ([[User talk:Gerv|talk]]) 11:41, 25 March 2013 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Ah, I see what you mean -- correct that top and second don't always work. Your approach makes more sense; I'll try to find a way to make it understandable for those of us less informed.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Pam
| |
| − |
| |
| − | I'm going to move this to the "Discussion" page for the draft. The Commentary pages are meant to be sort of "Reporter's Notes," information for adopters of guidelines on what the parameters of what they might want to change or what legal judgment calls have been made. I realize the structure isn't entirely clear and I'm trying to figure out how to make it clearer. Basically, I wanted the Discussion pages to be about things like this, and the Commentary to be annotations.
| |
| − |
| |
| − | ===Membership Fees===
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Some user groups charge membership fees for the purposes of venue hire, etc. Can we be a little more flexible than "no membership fees at all"?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | -- [[User:Gerv|Gerv]] ([[User talk:Gerv|talk]]) 10:38, 25 March 2013 (EDT)
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Absolutely! I was just trying to keep out profit-making. Suggestions for revision?
| |
| − |
| |
| − | Pam
| |
