Difference between revisions of "Case law"
From Model Trademark Guidelines
(→United States) |
(Adding cases) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | Decisions available [http://docs.modeltrademarkguidelines.org/public.php?service=files&t=67a248598fb6828be0c796609a82a34a here.] | ||
| + | |||
==Germany== | ==Germany== | ||
| − | + | I 20 U 176/11-Enigma (Düsseldorf 24 Apr 2012) (German) | |
| − | + | I 20 U 176/11-Enigma (Düsseldorf 24 Apr 2012) (English) | |
| + | |||
| + | U 147/09-Luxor (Hamburg 18 Jan 2012) | ||
==Poland== | ==Poland== | ||
| − | + | II GSK 1551/11-Der Grüne Punkt | |
| − | + | II GSK 1646/11-Der Grüne Punkt | |
==New Zealand== | ==New Zealand== | ||
| − | + | KOHA Decision of the Commissioner 91, [2013] NZIPOTM 47 | |
==United States== | ==United States== | ||
| − | + | ''Autodesk, Inc. v. Dassault Sys. Solidworks Corp.'', 685 F. Supp. 2d 1023, 1027-28 (N.D. Cal. 2009) | |
| + | |||
| + | ''FreecycleSunnyvale v. Freecycle Network'', 626 F.3d 509 (9th Cir. 2010) | ||
| − | + | ''Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc.'', 261 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2001) | |
| − | + | ''Progress Software Corp. v. MySQL AB'', 195 F.Supp.2d 328 (D. Mass. 2002) | |
Revision as of 06:47, 5 April 2014
Decisions available here.
Contents
Germany
I 20 U 176/11-Enigma (Düsseldorf 24 Apr 2012) (German)
I 20 U 176/11-Enigma (Düsseldorf 24 Apr 2012) (English)
U 147/09-Luxor (Hamburg 18 Jan 2012)
Poland
II GSK 1551/11-Der Grüne Punkt
II GSK 1646/11-Der Grüne Punkt
New Zealand
KOHA Decision of the Commissioner 91, [2013] NZIPOTM 47
United States
Autodesk, Inc. v. Dassault Sys. Solidworks Corp., 685 F. Supp. 2d 1023, 1027-28 (N.D. Cal. 2009)
FreecycleSunnyvale v. Freecycle Network, 626 F.3d 509 (9th Cir. 2010)
Planetary Motion, Inc. v. Techsplosion, Inc., 261 F.3d 1188 (11th Cir. 2001)
Progress Software Corp. v. MySQL AB, 195 F.Supp.2d 328 (D. Mass. 2002)
